Buried in complex new Military Commissions Act of 2006 is a real shocker, reaching far beyond the legal struggles about foreign terrorist suspects. This new law authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if you have never left the United States. And once you are thrown into military prison, you cannot expect a trial by your peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights. You can be designated as an enemy combatant if you have just contributed money to a Middle Eastern charity, and you can be held indefinitely in a military prison.
Read literally, this means that if the President or the Pentagon says you’re an unlawful enemy combatant — using whatever criteria they wish — then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to “hostilities” at all. This definition is not limited to Al Qaeda and the Taliban. It’s not limited to aliens — it covers U.S. citizens as well. It’s not limited to persons captured or detained overseas. And it is not even limited to the armed conflict against Al Qaeda and the Taliban, authorized by Congress on September 18, 2001. Indeed, on the face of it, it’s not even limited to a time of war or armed conflict; it could apply in peacetime.
It is easy to look away and hope for the best, to dismiss critics as the fringe left who think the worse about the United States or opponents of the President looking for partisan advantage.
Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to Thomas Paine, 1789. ME 7:408, Papers 15:269, said: “I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” And Patrick Henry warned us about Government officials who would seek to claim the right to imprison people without a trial:
We are not dealing with hypothetical abuses. The President has already subjected a citizen to military confinement.Â
Do you think you are safe from this because you are a good person or because you trust the judgment of President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld? Will you trust every president and secretary of defense forever? We already have kept a three-year old boy off a flight because someone with the same name was on a no-fly list. The path to hell is paved with good intentions.
Let’s suppose that in the future, some Preseident decides to take revenge someone named John Smith. The President then designates John Smith as an unlawful enemy combatant, and if your name is John Smith, well, nice knowing you. There’s nothing you can do about it then.
So you better do something about it between now and November 7th.
Regards,
Jim
I asked Proton’s Lumo AI tool about creating a democratic socialist state in the United States of America. Our authoritarian capitalism has…
These examples show that authoritarian capitalism can coexist with a relatively modest ideological veneer, whereas authoritarian fascism embeds a deep, often violent, mythic narrative…
I asked Proton’s Lumo AI tool about replacing authoritarian capitalism with democratic socialism. Just as authoritarian capitalism replaced authoritarian feudalism, what would…
I asked Proton’s Lumo AI tool for ideas on optimizing labor organizations for minimizing worker abuse under authoritarian capitalism. What worker based…
I asked Proton’s Lumo AI tool about how authoritarian capitalism destroys political democracies. Don't authoritarian economic systems like slavery, feudalism and capitalism,…
Here is my question to Proton’s Lumo AI tool on Donald J. Trump: Social Dominator Authoritarian. Do the actions of President Donald…