Economic neoliberalism, or free market fundamentalism, has been at work for decades in America transferring more and more wealth from the masses to the ONE%. Privatization of all that is public (SS, Medicare, pensions, etc.), or putting it on the back of individual consumers,is key to this transfer. Another avenue for this transfer has been the marketization of Health care where the public option was avoided in favor of uncontrolled private corporations.
The quotes below are from an article that details a thorough history of the privatization of our health care since WWII and, to some extent, health care in Europe.
Unfortunately, America is leading the way for the economic neoliberal approach. This model has, and will continue to, transfer more wealth from the many to the ONE% as we all pay more for health care, or decide to purchase something else and risk catastrophic illness. It will cost us more and more for health care as employers and the government reduce coverage and increase copays and deductibles.
“The neoliberal turn in American health care, that is to say, is part of a much more fundamental transformation, beyond the borders of both America and of health care, and away from the promise of economic justice itself.
“While the ACA will undoubtedly help many, there can be no mistaking the close resemblance of Obama’s plan to Nixon’s, and of its marked divergence from the universalism of Kennedy’s. The health care political center, in other words, has moved to the right very sharply indeed. Perhaps the greatest testament to this is the fact that the ACA, despite its roots in the proposals of moderate conservatives of previous eras, is now deemed rank socialism by today’s conservatives.
“But beneath the complexity of the law, the essence of the neoliberal vision … becomes clear. The fundamental social-democratic idea of universalism — of an entire population with the equal right to equally comprehensive health care benefits — has all but disappeared from the political center.
“The doctrine of consumer choice, whether with respect to the selection of tiered “bronze, silver, or gold†health benefits, or of choosing to divide one’s ‘own money’ between health care and other goods, has been almost quietly triumphant. Of course, this great neoliberal transformation in the political economy of American health care wasn’t the result of the vagaries of nature or the unique cultural proclivities of Americans: it was part and a parcel of a much larger corporate-driven transformation [as laid out in The Powell Plan of 1971], which, over these same years, has drastically exacerbated inequality while simultaneously fraying the substance of American civic democracy.”
Two elements of this history that were not pointed out directly were:
While low overhead universal health care is held in abeyance by a minority of wealthy, economic neoliberals, where’s their “Wal Mart†of healthcare to provide capitalism’s cost effective replacement? It’s not going to happen. There’s still more wealth to transfer and expanding uncontrolled health care is accelerating the rate of transfer.
On the one hand, patriotism divides citizens into multiple factions based on variable notions of a nation and its history. On the…
Voters have witnessed a long history of peaceful Executive leadership change. However, we’ve just seen, 1/6/2021, how fragile that transition…
This is about the need for national efforts to stop enabling haters (individuals and political parties) from optimizing their hunting…
In 2030, the entire world is condemned to extreme inequality, slavery, baby farms with women dressed in red and world domination as originally…
Any nation with either an authoritarian political system or an authoritarian economic system, like predatory capitalism, is susceptible to totalitarianism.…
View Comments
Neo-liberals and Faux News likes to terrify the public with the idea of communist "Central Planning" while their own agenda is to have corporate control of everything, Corporate Planning in a system where corporations have not only the rights of persons, but also the authority and powers to coerce that traditionally are only held by governments.
Unregulated corporate power wants to sweep this under the rug, promoting their ideal atmosphere where 'greed is good' and 'government is evil'; but the truth occasionally shows up in the economic vocabulary:
As noted in EconoSTATS, "according to the central planners"
[any true move towards a free and open healthcare market is crushed by]
"a static vision of the market where central decision-makers claim to have superior information regarding the needs and wants of consumers (in this case patients). Of course, the root cause of the actual problem lies in the ineffective and incomparable pricing mechanisms indicative of the current health care system."
http://econostats.org/the-nonsensical-economics-of-hospital-pricing/
Neo-liberals actually hate consumer choice, this is one reason they fear Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The phrase "uncontrolled health care" is good. The neo-liberal preference is for de-regulation of every section of society to be used for pure capitalistic profit. Healthcare fits into the catagory of things that serve society best when publicly administered, not privately controlled. The neo-liberals are wolves in sheep's clothing and need to be put in the spotlight as being parasites and predators on society and society's wealth.