New Port Security Agreement with Pakistan – Is National Security Taking a Hit More Significant Than the Dubai Terminal Deal?

In my first article on the Dubai Ports World business deal, I made reference to the Container Security Initiative (CSI).   As reported by U.S. Customs Today: 

The CSI consists of four core elements. These are: (1) establishing security criteria to identify high-risk containers; (2) pre-screening containers before they arrive at U.S. ports; (3) using technology to pre-screen high-risk containers; and (4) developing and using smart and secure containers.

The fundamental objective of the CSI is to first engage the ports that send the highest volumes of container traffic into the United States, as well as the governments in these locations, in a way that will facilitate detection of potential problems at their earliest possible opportunity. 

The second core element, pre-screening, is conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Security Department officials located at the port of origination.  As of December, 2005, there were 42 ports in 23 countries/city states, including UAE’s Dubai Port, that have implemented CSI and allow on-site inspection by U.S officials.

Now for the new agreement with Pakistan, that was signed at the conclusion of President Bush’s recent visit to Pakistan. According to the Daily Times of Pakistan, Pakistan and the U.S. have signed a Declaration of Principles on Integrated Cargo Container Control (IC3) for Port Qasim.  Prior to this agreement, Port Qasim containers were diverted to and scanned at ports in Hong Kong, Colombo, Sri lanka, and Salalah, Saudi Arabia before they are shipped to the U. S.  Two of these ports have implemented CSI and on-cite inspections.

So, how is this Port Qasim IC3 agreement different from CSI? First of all, Pakistan will be able to reduce its export costs to the U.S by avoiding a short stop at a CSI port. Secondly, and far more important,  just like the Pakistan government won’t allow our troops in their country, they have refused to “allow the posting of at least two officials of US Customs and Border Security Department at Port Qasim for monitoring of [the] scanning process of the cargo containers.”   Instead, Pakistan “has managed to convince the US authorities on the scanning supervision by via[sic] live video link by the customs authorities of Pakistan and the US.” 

How is this IC3 agreement good for our national security? We are going from on-site inspections at CSI compliant ports to remote video?

Andy Hailey

Vietnam Vet, UT El Paso Grad, Retired Aerospace Engineer, former union rep, 60's Republican now progressive, web admin, blogger.

Recent Posts

My Most Recent Postings Are Shared at Op Ed News

--------- Check them out! ---------

1 year ago

Preserving Our Democracy – Allegiance To a Nation OR Serving a More Perfect Union

On the one hand, patriotism divides citizens into multiple factions based on variable notions of a nation and its history. On the…

2 years ago

Voters Can Empower and Protect Our Threatened Democracy

Voters have witnessed a long history of peaceful Executive leadership change.  However, we’ve just seen, 1/6/2021, how fragile that transition…

2 years ago

WAR, Civil or World, Enables Hunting Humans

This is about the need for national efforts to stop enabling haters (individuals and political parties) from optimizing their hunting…

2 years ago

Authoritarian Domination by 2030 in US!

In 2030, the entire world is condemned to extreme inequality, slavery, baby farms with women dressed in red and world domination as originally…

3 years ago

Predatory Capitalism: Chaining It?, Embracing It?, Controlling it?, Saving it?, Replacing It!

Any nation with either an authoritarian political system or an authoritarian economic system, like predatory capitalism, is susceptible to totalitarianism.…

3 years ago